Towards the new JRC of 1973
JRC more than 30 Years Ago
The history of Euratom- The European
Atomic Energy Community - created in 1957 - appears to be a fascinating
subject. Almost every year there are published
new contributions [1] to the extensive library describing the origin of
the Treaty, tracing the work done under the Treaty, analysing the expectations,
the successes, the failures and predicting the future of the Community, which
after all even today form an integral part of the European Union. The present
lines are in yet another publication from the early Euratom days.
The fathers of the Euratom
Treaty had much foresight. They rightly felt that research was a way to foster
the development of nuclear energy. The first chapter of the Euratom Treaty is
devoted to the development of research. It advised a co-ordination of the
national research programmes in the nuclear areas under guidance of the
Commission, disapproved possible unnecessary duplication and invited the
Commission to describe areas, which were not sufficiently studied. Above all
the Treaty introduced the concept of multi-annual Community research programmes
and defined in its annex the first five-year programme for research and
education with detailed work areas and the associated financial resources. In
budgetary terms the vast majority, some 75% of the work should be executed by
Euratom in the Joint Centre and the remaining work, supplementary to the
work of the Centre, performed under contracts outside the Centre. Amongst the
work for the Joint Centre was a major project (one third of the budgetary
resources) on development of prototype nuclear reactors, other projects were as
well described and resources set aside to equip the laboratories of the Centre.
It was clear that the Centre should become multidisciplinary. Next to the
nuclear projects, the Treaty mentioned general laboratories for physics,
chemistry, electronics and metallurgy.
The Joint Centre! The Treaty decided that the Commission should
establish a Joint Nuclear Research Centre (since the 1970s called the JRC - The
Joint Research Centre - as used in the following text), which should execute
research programmes, and other tasks decided by the Commission or described in
the Treaty. The activities of the JRC could for geographical or functional
reasons, be carried out in separate establishments.
In fact the JRC in the early
1960s came into active life on four geographical locations: Geel (
The human resources are the most
important resource for the functioning of any enterprise, and indeed for the
JRC. The ambitious plans of the Euratom Treaty called for the Commission to
secure staffing of the research establishments. As it was to be a European
centre, the JRC had to be staffed by nationals of all the Member States. It was
initially not easy to find sufficient numbers of scientists, engineers, nuclear
technicians, etc. of requisite competence, but they did come to take up the
European challenge.
And it was a challenge! Above all, the
European staff members that gathered little by little in the JRC were highly
competent and they met this large European experiment with a true
"pioneering spirit". By 1961 they numbered almost 1.500, more than
half of whom were based in Ispra, which has remained the major site of the JRC
ever since. The number grew in the following years and both men and women were
recruited. The female role was considered also in the early days. An article
"Les femmes 'atomiques' du lac Majeur",
L'Illustré,
The highly competent staff. The Frenchman
Etienne Hirsch (1901 - 1994) was the second President of the Euratom Commission
1959 - 1962. He left at the end of his term following his famous clash with
General de Gaulle [3], but maintained a strong interest and belief in Euratom,
and indeed in a united
The Years after 1967.The first Euratom
5-year programme was followed by a second one for the years 1963 - 1967 as
decided by the Council of Ministers. For numerous and often analysed reasons it
however was impossible for the Member States to agree upon a continuation. The
policies of the Member States, or at least some of them, had changed markedly
since the early enthusiasm involved in the initial establishment of the Euratom
Treaty - industrial relations met with difficulties and some Member Countries
did not always welcome relations with third countries. [4]
The JRC establishments for
several years had to survive on an ad hoc basis decided only for
one year at a time and with very severely reduced budgets. This crisis hit all
the JRC locations very badly, but worst of all Ispra. Ispra was not only the
largest site, but here much work had been concentrated on a major development
project (ORGEL - Organic-Eau Lourde, organic-heavy water reactor type), which
had to be abandoned. The other establishments were mainly engaged in long-term
work: The Nuclear Measurements Bureau at Geel, the study of Transuranium
elements in
The
The "dark" years
since 1968 and up to 1973 obviously had very strong consequences for the
staff and their morale. They had come to the JRC most enthusiastic to use their
competences for the sake of the European Community and they were the real
victims of the crisis, which was not due to them - quite the contrary! Some left to seek new challenges elsewhere,
but many remained. They found force to let their voice and views be known
widely, as the present publication bears solid witnesses of. For an outside
observer this appears not only to be a fight for preserving the place of work
and the jobs. It as well and perhaps even more was deeper rooted in the strong
belief of the advantages of a European Community, a united
The JRC resources were very
scarce during these years. Infrastructure and equipment became run down, the
future was uncertain. Nevertheless the scientists kept up research activities,
and also contributed to the future of the JRC by engaging in novel lines of
research which they sensed could be of value for a
There are many witnesses of
this through contributions to the scientific literature, scientific meetings
and congresses from JRC scientists during the difficult years 1968 - 1973
leading up to the new era with a decided new multi-annual research programme.
The press in several countries also noted it. [2]
To this could be added
testimonials from scientists around
The World,
As ever, everything hinges on
the high competence and devotion of the staff - something that always through
"sunny and raining" days has characterised the JRC, and is continuing
as noted by outside observers!
The present publication may be felt to
emphasise on particularly "raining" days. It however provides a clear
confirmation of staff efforts to overcome very difficult circumstances, not
just for their own sake, but also for the sake of
It is in acknowledgement of
this a group of friends of the JRC felt the present publication should be
facilitated with their sponsorship.
Hans Jørgen Helms
References:
1. European Parliament,
Directorate-General for Research, Working Paper: The European Parliament and
the Euratom Treaty: past, present and future, Energy and Research Series ENER
114 EN, 2002 - Authors: Dr. Mervyn O'Driscoll, University College Cork;
Available on
http://www.europarl.eu.int/studies
2. JRC Public Relations and
Press, Ispra Establishment: Thirty Years of the Ispra Establishment
3. Etienne Hirsch: Ainsi va la
vie, Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe,
4. Joint Research Centre,
European Commission, JRC Information and Public Relations Unit: JRC - 40 Years
of Service for
Available on
www.jrc.cec.eu.int click on What we
offer and then on Alumni Network
5. European Commission,
Directorate-General XII, Science, Research, Development. Luca Guzzetti: A brief
History of European Union Research Policy, October 1995, ISBN 92 827 5353 0
(Office for Official Publications of the European Communities)